Questions
What Is the Relocating Principle and How Does It Apply to Manhood?
Summary: The relocating principle (drawn from Paul in Ephesians 5–6) is the move by which Christians neither assimilate to cultural scripts nor reject existing social structures, but relocate them under Christ’s authority. Applied to manhood, it asks what strength, provision, courage, and leadership actually look like when defined by the cross rather than by a cultural sacred-social order.
The relocating principle, drawn from Paul’s approach in Ephesians 5-6, describes the move by which Christians neither assimilate to a rival sacred-social order nor reject wholesale the social structures they inhabit. Instead, they relocate those structures under the authority of God. Paul does not tell early Christians to stop being husbands or members of households. He tells them that when they become husbands and members of households under God, they are to fundamentally redefine what those relationships involve.
Applied to questions of manhood, the relocating principle suggests that the problem is not that men care about strength, provision, courage, or leadership. The problem involves allowing a cultural sacred-social order to define what those things mean. Cultural masculinity tells men something like the following: strength is the absence of vulnerability, provision requires men to be the breadwinner at home, power comes in use rather than restraint, and leadership often requires dominance. Discipleship tells a different story about each.
To relocate manhood under Christ is not to abandon all concern for strength or leadership but to ask what those things look like when they are shaped by the cross. The strong man, in the logic of the cross, is the one who can absorb loss for others. The leader is the one who serves. The bold man is the one who tells the truth at personal cost. He is willing to exercise restraint knowing that waiting on God is not a sign of cowardice, but courage. These are not feminized alternatives to machismo. They are what faithfulness produces when it is not captive to a rival sacred order.
The practical work of relocation is slow and formational. It requires worship, teaching, communal accountability, and the kind of patient reasoning that allows cultural instincts to be examined rather than simply enacted. It does not happen by exchanging one set of cultural slogans for another.
Key Takeaways: Relocation, Not Rejection
- The Pauline Move (Eph 5–6): Paul does not tell Christians to stop being husbands or members of households; he tells them to redefine those roles under God’s authority.
- What Gets Relocated: Strength, provision, courage, and leadership remain—but are redefined by the cross rather than by cultural masculinity.
- The Cruciform Reframe: The strong man absorbs loss; the leader serves; the bold man tells the truth at personal cost; restraint is courage, not cowardice.
- The “So What”: Relocation is slow, formational work requiring worship, teaching, and communal accountability—not a swap of cultural slogans.
About the Author — James Spencer, PhD, is a theologian, author, and host of the Thinking Christian podcast, where he writes and speaks on Christian formation, political theology, and technology. He holds a PhD in Theological Studies from Trinity Evangelical Divinity School and an MA in Biblical Exegesis from Wheaton College. He serves as president of the D. L. Moody Center in Northfield, Massachusetts, as an Associate Research Fellow at the Kirby Laing Centre for Public Theology, and as adjunct faculty in Wheaton College’s MA in Leadership program. His forthcoming book is Digital Discernment (InterVarsity Press). Learn more at thinkingchristian.org.